Apple's record June quarter, and the sell-off that followed

·8 min read
A data-forward cover graphic showing Apple's $109.4B record June-quarter revenue in large typography against a near-white background, with a note that shares fell about 6%.
AAPL · Q2-2026 · See full breakdown

Apple just did something it had never done in a June quarter, and the market punished it for what comes next.

The trailing numbers were close to flawless. Total revenue of $109.4 billion, up 16% year over year, the strongest June quarter in the company's history. Diluted EPS of $2.02, up 29%. Gross margin of 50.06%, the first time Apple has ever cleared 50% on a reported basis. iPhone at $54.3 billion, up 22%. Mac at $10.4 billion, up 29%. Both beat what analysts had modeled.

And the stock fell about 6% in after-hours trading, shedding something like $390 billion of market value in an hour. This was Tim Cook's last earnings call as CEO, and he spent part of it warning shareholders about a shortage nobody wanted to hear about.

A record quarter, on almost every lineLink to this section

Bar chart of Apple total revenue across eight quarters from FY24Q4 to FY26Q3, with a line showing YoY growth; the FY26Q3 bar is $109.4B at +16.4% YoY.
Eight-quarter revenue arc. At $109.4B, FY26Q3 is Apple's largest June quarter ever, up 16.4% YoY, with growth holding in the mid-teens for three straight quarters.

Apple's revenue swings hard by season, so the honest comparison is year over year rather than against the December holiday peak. On that basis, $109.4 billion versus $94.0 billion a year ago is a 16.4% gain, and the growth is broad. Every geographic segment grew double digits. iPhone, Mac and Services each set a new June-quarter record. Operating cash flow hit a June-quarter record of about $34.4 billion.

EPS of $2.02 beat the roughly $1.89 the Street expected, and revenue cleared the ~$108.9 billion consensus. On the trailing quarter alone, there was very little to complain about. The problem is that "the trailing quarter" is not what moved the stock.

iPhone and Mac carry it; iPad is the soft spotLink to this section

Horizontal bar chart of Apple FY26Q3 revenue by product category with YoY growth labels: iPhone $54.3B +21.7%, Services $30.7B +12.1%, Mac $10.4B +28.7%, Wearables $7.9B +6.5%, iPad $6.2B -5.9%.
Mac's +29% is the standout on the new M-series MacBook cycle. iPad, lapping a strong prior-year refresh, is the only category down year over year.

The clean beats were in hardware. iPhone at $54.3 billion topped the ~$53.6 billion estimate, helped by the current lineup. Mac was the real surprise: $10.4 billion, up 29% year over year and up 23% sequentially, against an estimate closer to $8.6 billion, driven by the latest MacBook refresh. Mac climbed to 9.5% of revenue, its highest mix in the set, which pushed iPhone's share down to 49.6% even as iPhone dollars grew more than 20%.

Not everything worked. iPad fell 6% year over year to $6.2 billion, lapping a strong prior-year refresh, and Wearables was a single-digit grower. Those are small lines. The bigger disappointment sat in Services.

Services and China: the demand-quality missesLink to this section

Services set a June-quarter record at $30.7 billion, up 12%. But records are not the same as beats. The Street wanted something closer to $31.2 billion, and 12% growth is a step down from the mid-teens rates Apple posted earlier in the fiscal year. Management pointed to a gaming slowdown and App Store business-model changes as part of the drag. Services is the bull case's high-margin compounder, so any deceleration there gets scrutinized harder than a hardware line would.

Combined bar and line chart of Apple Greater China revenue across six quarters from FY25Q2 to FY26Q3, with YoY growth overlaid; FY26Q3 is $18.8B, +22.4% YoY but down 8.2% sequentially.
Greater China's third consecutive quarter above 20% YoY growth, at +22.4%. The absolute figure of $18.8B still stepped down 8% sequentially and landed below the ~$19.6B Street number.

Greater China is the more interesting call. On paper it looks strong: $18.8 billion, up 22.4% year over year, a third consecutive quarter of 20%-plus growth, which is the best sustained China run Apple has managed since the iPhone 12 cycle. But the Street had penciled in roughly $19.6 billion, and the segment fell about 8% from the prior quarter. After two years of flat-to-negative China prints, expectations had reset upward, and this quarter cleared the year-ago bar without clearing the analyst bar.

The 50% margin comes with an asteriskLink to this section

Line chart of Apple total gross margin across eight quarters from FY24Q4 to FY26Q3, rising from 46.22% to 50.06%, crossing a dashed 50% line, with a marker noting ~48.1% underlying margin after a one-time tariff refund.
Reported gross margin cleared 50% for the first time. About 2 points of that came from a one-time tariff refund; the underlying figure is closer to 48.1%, still a record on a like-for-like basis.

Here is the detail that got less airtime than it deserved. Apple's headline 50.06% gross margin and $2.02 EPS both include a one-time tariff refund worth roughly 2 percentage points of margin and about $0.11 of EPS. Strip that out and underlying gross margin was closer to 48.1%, with underlying EPS around $1.91. That benefit flows mostly through Products cost of sales, which is why Products gross margin jumped more than 5 points year over year.

To be clear, 48.1% underlying is still a record-high underlying June-quarter margin, and $1.91 is still up about 22% on a like-for-like basis. But it is not a recurring operating gain, and the reported "first time above 50%" headline reads better than the run-rate supports.

Why the stock actually fellLink to this section

Records were priced in. AAPL went into the print near all-time highs, around $340, up roughly 22% on the year, so a clean beat was already in the number. The marginal news came from the outlook. Apple guided the September quarter to about +9-11% year-over-year growth, near $113 billion at the midpoint, below the ~$114.9 billion the Street wanted.

And the reason for the soft guide was the memorable line of the night. Cook described a "hundred-year flood" in memory pricing, a DRAM and NAND shortage — amplified by AI data-center demand — that is squeezing component costs and capping how much of strong iPhone demand Apple can actually supply into the September quarter. The company has been stockpiling inventory ahead of it; inventories on the balance sheet rose to about $11.1 billion from $5.7 billion at fiscal year-end. Memory suppliers like Micron and SK Hynix rallied after hours on the same commentary, since the cost pressure hurting Apple's margin is a tailwind for the chipmakers.

Put together, the report handed investors a soft guide, two demand-quality misses in Services and China, and a fresh margin risk from memory costs, all against a stock priced for a perfect print. The options market had implied a move of about 3.4%; the realized drop was nearly double that.

Cook's last call, Ternus's first problemLink to this section

The timing gives the quarter an extra layer. This was Tim Cook's final earnings call as CEO. Under the transition announced in April, Cook becomes Executive Chairman and John Ternus takes over as CEO on September 1, 2026. Because the handover was pre-disclosed, it was not the sell-off catalyst, but it does frame the setup. R&D rose about 32% year over year to roughly $11.7 billion to fund the generative-AI roadmap, including the "all-new Siri AI" Cook highlighted from WWDC. Ternus inherits that spending, the memory-cost squeeze, and a Services line that needs to reaccelerate.

Analyst reaction: supply, not demandLink to this section

The early sell-side verdict leaned toward "delay, not damage." JPMorgan's Samik Chatterjee was first out with a post-print move, trimming his target to $340 from $345 while keeping a Buy, arguing that supply constraints push revenue into later quarters rather than signaling weaker demand. Gene Munster of Deepwater made the same point more bluntly, estimating that without currency and supply constraints the September guide would have implied roughly 15% growth rather than about 12%. Into the print, targets ranged from JPMorgan near $340 up to Wedbush's Street-high $400. The bull rebuttal is coherent: if the constraint is memory supply, the demand is still there to be captured once the flood recedes.

What to watchLink to this section

Three things define the next print, and it will be Ternus's first as CEO. First, whether Greater China holds above 20% once the sequential step-down is behind it, or slides back toward the flat prints of the prior two years. Second, whether Services can climb back toward mid-teens growth or whether the gaming and App Store drags persist. Third, and most important, how far the memory-cost "flood" actually cuts into gross margin now that the one-time tariff benefit rolls off. The operating company just posted its best June quarter ever. The market has already moved on to the September one.

earningsaaplappleiphoneq3-2026tim-cookjohn-ternus